If you think the senior civil servants that drafted George Osborne's Spending Review speech had a hard time, please spare a thought for the senior civil servant, in BIS, tonight who is writing some exciting new policies for small business to show that the government 'really, really' cares about them. All of the new policies will need to be put together within a total cost of a £fiver .
Now, you might think a fiver isn't a lot to allocate to small business support, including start ups, but in fact it's not far off what small businesses have received for many years from government. The budgeting is modelled on a Treasury variation of Pareto, it's called the Fat-cat-o rule. It states that 95% of all government skills and support funding, including bale out money, must go to 'substantial employers' (code for fat cats) and civil service infrastructure to quality assure it (code for jobs for the boys), and up to 5% or a fiver (whichever is less) can go to 4.3 million other businesses in the UK.
So think of it that, theoretically, £5.3 billion cuts in BIS will affect 30,000 bigger businesses. But only a little bit because they've already taken the money and run. It will still leave the fiver, that there was before, to help start ups and small business owners to survive and thrive.
It does mean that the civil servant who is drafted in to write the new small business support policies won't fit with your picture of a drab, grey, middle aged man on £150,000 a year awaiting his millionaire's pension, yacht and retirement mansion, often but not always in that order. No, this civil servant will be a creative sort - a fantasist. Ever since the election, and the inexorable rise of the dream party coalition, this person will have been locked up in a room in Ivory Tower or the dungeons at 1 Victoria Street, as far away as possible from the influence of real small business owners, until they come up with the goods. Their only two companions will be the complete works of JK Rowling and an inspiring photograph of a new, yet ridiculously rich, small business owner - usually Tony Blair.
Now you may say that you've heard government announcements from time to time like '£60 million invested into small firms training' . Ah, but in fact by the time they've set up the infrastructure, including quality assurance, and then brought in the contractors to deliver the training there's usually only - good, you're catching on - a fiver - left for the small business owner.
We asked our expert civil servant small business policy writer watcher what they thought we might expect in terms of small business support policy following the Spending Review 'Three things' said our anonymous expert 'and maybe a couple of others as padding which will never see the light of day. I expect the new initiatives to support small businesses to be derived from what are known in the policy writing trade as ESB, OAHBS and TURDV.
'Let me explain,' our anonymous expert continued, ' ESB – the Entrepreneurial Smart Box’, OAHBS (pronounced Oh, Ah, Bees) – the Open All Hours Business School and the TURDV (the V is silent) – Training U-like Response Discount Vouchers’.
The Minister will be able to announce that he is ‘delighted that these three 'joined up' initiatives can be delivered with a light touch but represent a step change in additionality.These initiatives are truly original and bear no relationship to what has worked in helping start ups and growing businesses in the past.'
'In fact,' he will continue, 'the ESB, Entrepreneurial Smart Box, was ‘trail-blazed’ in five regions with twelve entrepreneurs per region locked away in a top hotel/leisure resort for eight weeks. There the entrepreneurs could mix business with leisure and bounce ideas off each other. Their conversations were taped and fed back to them as they slept. This ‘learning from peers’ process was felt to be very successful and eight weeks deemed to be just long enough for a business to prove that it could survive without the presence of the Owner Manager. Indeed, nearly two-thirds of the businesses did survive.
The OAHBS – Open All Hours Business School has proven very popular with small business owners who need to relax after business hours with a drink. Top business schools at Cranfield, Durham, Warwick, Scarborough and Manchester now mix the ‘gin’ of management and leadership development with the ‘tonic’ of entrepreneurial ribaldry and retribution. An additional feature is the opportunity to visit other Business schools by train. Indeed, one entrepreneur rated the experience of six hours of buffet trolley hospitality between Scarborough and York as ‘staggering’.
Finally, TURDV – Training U-like Response Discount Vouchers allows the small business owner to invest in technology and to maximise their use of it. So, for example, a business owner purchasing any Microsoft Office package will be given £50 in vouchers for training support by Microsoft for any other Microsoft software they purchase next. A similar voucher scheme is likely to be used by banks for micro loans to start ups. So, instead of money the prospective entrepreneur will be given vouchers which will be redeemable against business planning advice from a bank adviser. Much more useful'
A lot to look forward to then, for a fiver, from small business policy after the Spending Review.
Showing posts with label satire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label satire. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Monday, December 07, 2009
Ministers' Speeches Automatic Translator Launched
The Soculitherz patented, automatic, simultaneous translator (in hot pink) of Ministers’ speeches for Senior Civil Servants.
As part of the government speed and efficiency drive, which lasts several months up to the announcement of the next election, Ministers have found a way of reducing the time they need to spend with their senior civil servants. Ministers have commissioned Canadian celebrity, fashionista, investigative journalist and absurd British rituals analyst, Leonora Soculitherz, to devise ‘a process to deliver’ automatic, simultaneous translations of their speeches This will enable senior civil servants to understand immediately what was meant by the phrases used.
Ms Soculitherz was regarded as ideal for this job as a) she is expensive and a celebrity b) she is reclusive, is abroad and speaks French i.e. the press can’t interview her, and, c) she has spent a lot of time following the language and habits of the UK’s leadership species in their own environment. This includes politicians and senior civil servants in historical, posh and privileged gaffs, UK financial sector executives in either casinos or lap dancing clubs and fat cat, major employers getting fatter from handouts in historical, posh and privileged gaffs, casinos and lap dancing clubs.
Government are so pleased with Ms Soculitherz’s patented, simultaneous translator (in hot pink) that they have allowed her hapless but only authorised UK agent, Tony Robinson, to post this BBC report on today’s announced ‘Government Spending Cut Backs’ to show how it works. The automatic, simultaneous translation for the senior civil servants is in bold.
Brown promises action on 'excessive' public sector pay
Gordon Brown outlined the plan for spending cuts at the Royal Society in London
Gordon Brown has said overpaid public sector workers will be "named and shamed" (don’t worry this is v. unlikely - only applies to those criticising our policies or track record) in efforts to deliver more value for money in public services.
Ahead of Wednesday's pre-Budget report, the PM said "efficiency savings" (‘efficiency’ means ‘hypothetical’ throughout i.e. budgets for projects we would have spent if we had not decided not to spend anything or any more on these projects plus we’ve added a bit more hypothetical savings on top - using numbers that are really, really easy for us all to add up or divide) would help to save £12bn over four years - £3bn more than planned in the Budget.
‘Crime maps’ and ‘online school reports’ will be used to cut overheads as Labour tries to halve the Budget deficit (just routine tech gobbledygook – again don’t worry they’re just a repackaging of electronic data we’ve got already – we’ve got more data on everyone than any other country in the world which is why we can afford to lose so much of it on trains, planes and taxis – hee, hee..).
The Conservatives say the government is not being straight on the cuts needed.
The government has delayed its planned ‘comprehensive spending review’ until after a general election (whenever you see the word ‘review’ this relates to a distant point in time by which time the need for a review will have been overtaken by other events.)
'Culture of excess'
In the pre-Budget report, Mr Darling is expected to confirm annual borrowing will ‘top £175bn’ - which the government has promised to halve within four years (the word ‘top’ is an indicator to you that the figures have been inflated but are still really, really easy to add up or divide – they’re so big no-one understands how we guessed them in the first place and we always add on the odd £25 billion so that we can show a big improvement through cuts & savings).
In his speech in central London, Mr Brown said ministers had identified ‘£3bn in additional efficiency savings’ since the Budget in April. (we thought 3 was a great number – spooky I know - but if you divide 9 by 3 you get 3 so we added another 3 to get 12) Of that, ‘£1.3bn over four years’ (again it’s all in the maths using the lucky number 3 – our fave of the really, really easy numbers - so if you divide the 12 by 3 you get 4 then divide the 4 by 3 and you get 1.3 – hey presto) would be achieved by streamlining central government, he said, indicating that certain ‘programmes would have to be delayed or abandoned’ (ie. hypothetical programmes we never could have afforded we’ve now saved by delaying or abandoning what we were never going to do).
Government spending on ‘consultants’ would be cut by half and communication spending by a quarter - saving £650m - while more Civil Service staff would be relocated from London to "cheaper" premises. (please, please don’t worry the consultants or the staff – basically before anything happens to staff or consultants there has to be a ‘review’ and the consultant’s charges will be hidden within the £60 million costs of each relocation plus the hypothetical staff savings)
Whitehall departments could set up "common spending policies" (we may have to use less consultants and companies to deliver our programmes but give each one of them a lot more money each – this continues our current procurement practice to save the bother of having too many small suppliers – all getting too little from us) and ‘share office space’ (we’ll have a lot of empty space in the new premises we buy for relocation and the old premises we can’t get rid of – it’ll be a bit of a muddle for a while) , as part of a "third generation of changes in public services" (we kept to our overall theme of 3 as in 3rd – don’t worry there wasn’t a 1st and 2nd that you missed).
In its report, Putting The Frontline First, the government points out there are now 4,300 senior civil servants compared with 3,100 in the mid-1990s. (yes, we know, we rounded up again which is always best when you’re rushing – if you divide 3,100 by 3 you get 1033 – so the real, hypothetical number of current senior civil servants – no-one will ask us how we defined ‘senior’ - should have been 4,233)
Mr Brown said public sector workers earning an "over-generous" (we haven’t found any of these yet) salary would be "named and shamed" (see above – don’t worry if you’re on our side), as many had "lost touch" (if we do find any then there must be some other perks and kick backs that they’re getting that the rest of us aren’t - this kind of unsharing, ungiving abnormality will not be tolerated (except in former leading public servants).
In future, all new public sector jobs with salaries above £150,000 (i.e you’ll have to make do with the £129k to £147k current pay band until after the election but we’ll see what we can do on allowances),will have to be approved by the Treasury while the details of civil servants and other public sector managers under direct ministerial control currently earning that amount will be published.
Government would use technological advances to make services more user-friendly and cheaper. As an example, ‘sending text messages to remind patients about GP appointments could help save up to £600m a year wasted on missed visits.’ (I know, I know - we will need a team of crack £147k p.a. leading public servants to set up a Sector Skills Council - Skills4GP&Patient Texting so that we can pay leading consultants to devise training methods for massive training companies, from overseas, to deliver to GPs and patients so that no-one inadvertently texts ‘u’ll b dead 11 tmrw – dr T’ instead of ‘u’ll b due at 11 tmrw – dr T’)
Finis
As part of the government speed and efficiency drive, which lasts several months up to the announcement of the next election, Ministers have found a way of reducing the time they need to spend with their senior civil servants. Ministers have commissioned Canadian celebrity, fashionista, investigative journalist and absurd British rituals analyst, Leonora Soculitherz, to devise ‘a process to deliver’ automatic, simultaneous translations of their speeches This will enable senior civil servants to understand immediately what was meant by the phrases used.
Ms Soculitherz was regarded as ideal for this job as a) she is expensive and a celebrity b) she is reclusive, is abroad and speaks French i.e. the press can’t interview her, and, c) she has spent a lot of time following the language and habits of the UK’s leadership species in their own environment. This includes politicians and senior civil servants in historical, posh and privileged gaffs, UK financial sector executives in either casinos or lap dancing clubs and fat cat, major employers getting fatter from handouts in historical, posh and privileged gaffs, casinos and lap dancing clubs.
Government are so pleased with Ms Soculitherz’s patented, simultaneous translator (in hot pink) that they have allowed her hapless but only authorised UK agent, Tony Robinson, to post this BBC report on today’s announced ‘Government Spending Cut Backs’ to show how it works. The automatic, simultaneous translation for the senior civil servants is in bold.
Brown promises action on 'excessive' public sector pay
Gordon Brown outlined the plan for spending cuts at the Royal Society in London
Gordon Brown has said overpaid public sector workers will be "named and shamed" (don’t worry this is v. unlikely - only applies to those criticising our policies or track record) in efforts to deliver more value for money in public services.
Ahead of Wednesday's pre-Budget report, the PM said "efficiency savings" (‘efficiency’ means ‘hypothetical’ throughout i.e. budgets for projects we would have spent if we had not decided not to spend anything or any more on these projects plus we’ve added a bit more hypothetical savings on top - using numbers that are really, really easy for us all to add up or divide) would help to save £12bn over four years - £3bn more than planned in the Budget.
‘Crime maps’ and ‘online school reports’ will be used to cut overheads as Labour tries to halve the Budget deficit (just routine tech gobbledygook – again don’t worry they’re just a repackaging of electronic data we’ve got already – we’ve got more data on everyone than any other country in the world which is why we can afford to lose so much of it on trains, planes and taxis – hee, hee..).
The Conservatives say the government is not being straight on the cuts needed.
The government has delayed its planned ‘comprehensive spending review’ until after a general election (whenever you see the word ‘review’ this relates to a distant point in time by which time the need for a review will have been overtaken by other events.)
'Culture of excess'
In the pre-Budget report, Mr Darling is expected to confirm annual borrowing will ‘top £175bn’ - which the government has promised to halve within four years (the word ‘top’ is an indicator to you that the figures have been inflated but are still really, really easy to add up or divide – they’re so big no-one understands how we guessed them in the first place and we always add on the odd £25 billion so that we can show a big improvement through cuts & savings).
In his speech in central London, Mr Brown said ministers had identified ‘£3bn in additional efficiency savings’ since the Budget in April. (we thought 3 was a great number – spooky I know - but if you divide 9 by 3 you get 3 so we added another 3 to get 12) Of that, ‘£1.3bn over four years’ (again it’s all in the maths using the lucky number 3 – our fave of the really, really easy numbers - so if you divide the 12 by 3 you get 4 then divide the 4 by 3 and you get 1.3 – hey presto) would be achieved by streamlining central government, he said, indicating that certain ‘programmes would have to be delayed or abandoned’ (ie. hypothetical programmes we never could have afforded we’ve now saved by delaying or abandoning what we were never going to do).
Government spending on ‘consultants’ would be cut by half and communication spending by a quarter - saving £650m - while more Civil Service staff would be relocated from London to "cheaper" premises. (please, please don’t worry the consultants or the staff – basically before anything happens to staff or consultants there has to be a ‘review’ and the consultant’s charges will be hidden within the £60 million costs of each relocation plus the hypothetical staff savings)
Whitehall departments could set up "common spending policies" (we may have to use less consultants and companies to deliver our programmes but give each one of them a lot more money each – this continues our current procurement practice to save the bother of having too many small suppliers – all getting too little from us) and ‘share office space’ (we’ll have a lot of empty space in the new premises we buy for relocation and the old premises we can’t get rid of – it’ll be a bit of a muddle for a while) , as part of a "third generation of changes in public services" (we kept to our overall theme of 3 as in 3rd – don’t worry there wasn’t a 1st and 2nd that you missed).
In its report, Putting The Frontline First, the government points out there are now 4,300 senior civil servants compared with 3,100 in the mid-1990s. (yes, we know, we rounded up again which is always best when you’re rushing – if you divide 3,100 by 3 you get 1033 – so the real, hypothetical number of current senior civil servants – no-one will ask us how we defined ‘senior’ - should have been 4,233)
Mr Brown said public sector workers earning an "over-generous" (we haven’t found any of these yet) salary would be "named and shamed" (see above – don’t worry if you’re on our side), as many had "lost touch" (if we do find any then there must be some other perks and kick backs that they’re getting that the rest of us aren’t - this kind of unsharing, ungiving abnormality will not be tolerated (except in former leading public servants).
In future, all new public sector jobs with salaries above £150,000 (i.e you’ll have to make do with the £129k to £147k current pay band until after the election but we’ll see what we can do on allowances),will have to be approved by the Treasury while the details of civil servants and other public sector managers under direct ministerial control currently earning that amount will be published.
Government would use technological advances to make services more user-friendly and cheaper. As an example, ‘sending text messages to remind patients about GP appointments could help save up to £600m a year wasted on missed visits.’ (I know, I know - we will need a team of crack £147k p.a. leading public servants to set up a Sector Skills Council - Skills4GP&Patient Texting so that we can pay leading consultants to devise training methods for massive training companies, from overseas, to deliver to GPs and patients so that no-one inadvertently texts ‘u’ll b dead 11 tmrw – dr T’ instead of ‘u’ll b due at 11 tmrw – dr T’)
Finis
Tuesday, July 07, 2009
Stripping for Freedom Now Out
My latest book 'Stripping for Freedom' is out now, to rave reviews - naturally. If you order it from www.entrepreneursuk.com I promise to allow my idiot agent Tony Robinson to personally sign it for you on my behalf. If you want it without his signature then use Amazon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)